![]() ![]() ![]() Each product has its own unique set of features, but also has areas that reviewers would like to see improved. Users of both share the opinion that deployment is fairly easy and fast and that technical support is helpful. Others say that Veracode has saved them a lot of time and helped them comply with clients' requirements.Ĭomparison Results: Based on the parameters we compared, Sonarqube and Veracord are pretty well-matched in terms of popularity. Some users said they achieved greatly improved security, earlier detection of security defects in the life cycle, and were able to easily meet compliance requirements. ROI: While none of the reviews on Sonarqube explicitly mention an ROI, several users of Veracode say they have seen an ROI, some even as soon as six months after implementing it.Veracode reviewers have also provided very positive feedback on the service and support they receive, mentioning that technical support is very helpful. Service and Support: Users who have had experience with Sonarqube’s service and support under the licensed version state that support is good and responds quickly.Some users of Veracode consider it to be reasonably priced while others feel it is on the expensive side. Beyond that, other users find that the free open-source community version works really well for them. Pricing: Regarding standard licensing, users of Sonarqube feel that it is slightly expensive.While users value Veracode for its solid set of features, some feel it is lacking in its user interface and user experience, mentioning that it can be slow and could use some improvement. Users of Veracode appreciate its cloud-based approach, API integration, static scan, its stability, policy reporting, a great dashboard, static and dynamic analysis, SCA, and the fact that it is SaaS hosted. Some reviewers say the architecture and its development need to be improved, while others would prefer to see notification features added, better reporting, and would like more dynamic testing and documentation available. Features: Valuable features of Sonarqube include good stability and performance, good integration, scalability, QualityGate, friendly UI, security hotspot, time snapshot, segregation containment, and the suspension of product services.Most Veracode reviewers felt the same, with the exception of a few select reviewers that felt it was slightly complex. Ease of Deployment: Users of Sonarqube say that deployment is simple, easy, and straightforward.After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below. ![]() We performed a comparison between Sonarqube and Veracode based on our users’ reviews in five categories. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |